https://active-antenna.eu/amplifier-kit
Yes — the is actually a very good choice for VLF loop work and SID detection, much better suited than the LA-200 type devices.
The important point is that this amplifier was specifically designed for:
- small magnetic receiving loops
- LF through HF reception
- low noise
- high dynamic range
- balanced operation for common-mode noise rejection
Its specified usable range is 20 kHz to 55 MHz, which puts it directly into the SID/VLF region.
For SID monitoring around:
- 18.3 kHz
- 19.6 kHz
- 20.9 kHz
- 21.4 kHz
- 24.0 kHz
- 24.8 kHz
…it is technically well suited.
What makes it especially attractive for your use case:
- Excellent overload handling
Urban VLF environments are full of strong LF/MF broadcast signals and switch-mode noise. The LZ1AQ design has unusually high dynamic range and good IMD performance. - Balanced magnetic loop input
This helps suppress electric-field noise from mains wiring, LEDs, Ethernet, and Raspberry Pi systems — critical for SID work. - Works well with physically small loops
You do not need a giant antenna for SID. A 1 m to 2 m loop is practical. - Flat broadband response
Useful if you want to monitor several transmitters simultaneously with Spectrum Lab or SuperSID. - Proven by the SDR community
The LZ1AQ amplifiers are widely respected among LF/HF receive enthusiasts and SDR users.
For SID detection specifically, I would recommend:
Best configuration
Loop
- 1–2 m square or circular loop
- Copper tube, coax braid, or parallel wires
- Single turn preferred for broadband SID work
Amplifier
- LZ1AQ current-mode loop input
Receiver
- SDRplay
- Airspy HF+
- sound card + Spectrum Lab
- SuperSID setup
Best installation practice
- Put amplifier at loop
- Use shielded CAT5 as intended
- Battery power if possible
- Place loop outdoors and away from buildings
The amplifier’s common-mode rejection is one of its strongest features. That matters enormously in modern UK suburban noise environments.
One caution:
For pure SID work, a resonant tuned loop can sometimes outperform a broadband active loop because it rejects out-of-band noise better. But broadband active loops are vastly more convenient if:
- you monitor multiple VLF stations
- you use SDR waterfalls
- you want continuous spectral coverage
- you also use the antenna for LF/HF listening
So overall:
| Use | Verdict |
|---|---|
| SID detection | Excellent |
| Broadband VLF monitoring | Excellent |
| Urban noise rejection | Very good |
| Spectrum Lab / SDR use | Excellent |
| Weak-signal LF work | Very good |
| Simplicity | Moderate |
| Cost/performance | Excellent |
The only thing I would avoid is using very high gain settings initially. With SID systems, overload is often a bigger problem than insufficient sensitivity.
A practical starting point for you would be:
- 1.5 m square loop
- single turn
- mounted vertically
- LZ1AQ amplifier at feedpoint
- SDRplay into Spectrum Lab
That would make a very capable SID and VLF observatory system.