Calculate for me, with downloadable sheet with equations as well, the practical maximum acceptable deviation in flare angle (give the actual angles too) of SETI Horn of Plenty with usual dimensions (give those) and with extension 1m in length on end.

https://www.astronomy.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/SETI_Horn_Flare_Angle_Calculations-1.docx

Using the usual amateur SETI “Horn of Plenty” dimensions:

  • Horn length L = 1.22 m (4 ft)
  • Aperture width A = 0.91 m (3 ft)
  • WR-650 throat width a = 0.165 m

the flare half-angle is:

alpha = arctan((A – a)/(2L))

Substituting:

alpha = arctan((0.91 – 0.165)/(2 x 1.22))

alpha = arctan(0.3053)

alpha ~= 16.97 degrees

So:

  • Half flare angle ~= 17.0 deg
  • Full included flare angle ~= 33.9 deg

With a 1 m extension added to the horn:

  • New length L2 = 2.22 m

Then:

alpha2 = arctan((0.91 – 0.165)/(2 x 2.22))

alpha2 = arctan(0.1678)

alpha2 ~= 9.53 degrees

So with the extension:

  • Half flare angle ~= 9.5 deg
  • Full included flare angle ~= 19.1 deg

Practical maximum acceptable deviation

For a 1420 MHz hydrogen-line horn intended for amateur SETI/radio astronomy work, a practical engineering tolerance is roughly:

  • about +/-10 to 15 percent in flare angle

before noticeable degradation in:

  • impedance match
  • sidelobes
  • standing-wave ripple
  • gain smoothness

Therefore:

Original horn:

  • Nominal half-angle: 17.0 deg
  • Practical acceptable range: about 15 deg to 19 deg

Equivalent included angle:

  • about 30 deg to 38 deg

Extended horn:

  • Nominal half-angle: 9.5 deg
  • Practical acceptable range: about 8.5 deg to 10.5 deg

Equivalent included angle:

  • about 17 deg to 21 deg

The longer horn is more sensitive to construction errors because the flare is shallower, so panel alignment matters more.

By Admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.