My SETI Horn of Plenty use a WR-650 waveguide. What difference would it make to taper the waveguide down to a point rather than flat back to the waveguide?

If by “taper the waveguide down to a point” you mean replacing the flat shorted end behind the probe/feed with a pyramidal or conical taper that gradually narrows to a closed tip, the effect depends on where the taper is located and how long it is.

For a typical 1420 MHz WR-650 feed:

  • A flat metal back wall creates a well-defined reflection.
  • The distance from the probe to that back wall is chosen so the reflected wave reinforces the probe coupling.
  • This arrangement is easy to model and gives predictable impedance matching.

If you taper the back section to a point:

  1. The reflection becomes distributed
    • Instead of one strong reflection from a flat wall, reflections occur gradually along the taper.
    • The electrical “short circuit” is less sharply defined.
  2. Potentially broader bandwidth
    • A gradual taper can reduce standing-wave effects over a wider frequency range.
    • This principle is used in some broadband horn and waveguide terminations.
  3. Probe tuning changes
    • The optimum probe position would almost certainly move.
    • A probe tuned for a flat back wall would no longer present the same impedance.
  4. Possibly lower Q
    • The cavity behind the probe becomes less resonant.
    • This can make the feed less sensitive to dimensional errors but may slightly reduce peak performance at exactly 1420.405 MHz.
  5. Little gain increase
    • The taper would not significantly increase antenna gain.
    • Most gain comes from the horn aperture and dish (or antenna) geometry, not from the exact shape of the shorted end.

For a SETI Horn of Plenty feed operating solely at the hydrogen line, a properly positioned flat back wall is usually the better choice because:

  • Simpler construction.
  • Easier tuning.
  • Well-understood impedance behaviour.
  • Maximum efficiency at a single frequency.

A tapered back section becomes more attractive if you’re trying to cover a wider range (for example 1.2-1.7 GHz) with good matching.

A useful comparison is that the flat-back design behaves somewhat like a quarter-wave backshort cavity, whereas a pointed taper behaves more like a gradually transformed impedance that spreads reflections over a longer distance.

By Admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.